🔗 Share this article

Transpired he endured defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Over System & Ideology

For example, this was the director who having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss him for using too much that system. Bring in the process guy and later discard them for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.